3D terrain map of the fictional Kambaria region: a proposed mine outlined between a town, river, conservation zone and transport routes, with a map legend and an evaluation radar covering environment, economy, community, governance and liveability
Year 7 · Unit 03 of 05

Is It Worth It?

How do we decide whether extracting a resource is truly worth it?

The judgment unit. Students construct evaluation criteria across economic, environmental and liveability dimensions, then apply them to a proposal with no obviously right answer. This is where the program's honesty is most visible.

The five lessons

A town map surrounded by liveability factor cards — housing, transport, health, safety, parks, environment, family and community — with numbered ranking tokens
01
What Makes a Place Good to Live?
Liveability factors and perceptions; students assess and rank their own suburb first.
View lesson dashboard
A pristine WA creek at golden hour: clear water, granite boulders, river gums and a heron wading
02
Environmental Quality
How extraction can change environmental quality and what that does to the liveability of places.
View lesson dashboard
Aerial view at sunset of an open pit mine and tailings dam beside a residential town with ovals and parks — the trade-off in a single frame
03
Building the Criteria
Teams construct a weighted evaluation framework: economic benefit, environmental cost, liveability effects.
View lesson dashboard
A proposed mining operation rendered as a 3D terrain: open pit, glowing water systems, rail line to a coastal port, and a bulk carrier departing on its export route
04
The Proposal
Scenario briefing for a fictional WA project; stakeholder positions distributed and argued.
View lesson dashboard
A wooden gavel resting on a weathered table inside a corrugated-iron shed, red dirt and gum trees through the open door
05
The Verdict
Criteria applied; individual written recommendation drafted and submitted (summative).
View lesson dashboard

Students produce

A written recommendation for or against a fictional project, defended with criteria.

Industry connection

Live video Q&A with two partner employees — one early-career, one veteran.

Summative task · The Verdict — written recommendation

The year’s major analytical task: a written recommendation for or against a development proposal, defended against student-built criteria.

Curriculum alignment — the exact wording

This unit teaches the following mandated content, quoted verbatim from the revised Western Australian Curriculum.

Geography · Place and liveability

“The factors that influence the decisions people make about where to live and their perceptions of the liveability of places”

“The influence of environmental quality on the liveability of places”

Source: SCSA, Humanities and Social Sciences — Scope and sequence of the mandated curriculum content, P–10, For implementation in 2026.

← Unit 02From the Ground to Your Hand Unit 04 →What's the Job Actually Like?